Compressive orthotic bracing in the treatment of pectus carinatum: the use of radiographic markers to predict success.

PURPOSE The treatment of pectus carinatum (PC) has classically been operative, though compressive orthotic braces have been used with good success in recent years. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the use of radiologic measurements in a successful bracing protocol. METHODS Sixty-three patients with PC have been evaluated for an 8-year span. The average age is 13.3 +/- 2.5. Follow-up is from 4 to 60 months, with a median of 24 months. Seventeen patients with mild defects elected observation alone. The remaining 46 patients began the bracing protocol. Baseline chest computed tomography (CT) was obtained, and custom-fitted orthotic braces were constructed for each patient. Radiographic markers were evaluated to include the Haller index, angle of sternal rotation, and asymmetry index. Patient surveys and chart review were used to identify compliance and success rates. Pretreatment CTs were retrospectively reviewed by bracing outcomes and radiographic measurements were compared. Ten patients received posttreatment CTs after successful bracing. RESULTS Of 63 patients with PC, 17 patients (27%) with mild defects elected observation alone. The remaining 46 patients began the bracing protocol as described above. Of these, 10 are excluded from analysis, with 6 patients currently in the early treatment phase and 4 who have been lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 36 patients, 8 failed bracing because of noncompliance. Of the 28, 24 patients who completed treatment report either good or excellent results after bracing. Eight patients have required surgical intervention, 4 as a result of noncompliance and 4 who were compliant but failed bracing. In patients who were compliant, significant differences were seen on initial CT between those with successful outcomes and those who required surgical repair. Haller index (2.85 vs 2.05; P < .05), angle of sternal rotation (27.3 vs 14.8; P < .05), and asymmetry index (1.23 vs 1.06; P < .01) were all higher in the group who failed bracing. In those who successfully completed treatment, there was no significant difference in the Haller or asymmetry indices, but the average improvement in sternal rotation was 53.8%. CONCLUSION Compressive orthotic bracing is a successful method of treatment of pectus carinatum. The associated sternal rotation can be significantly improved with appropriate bracing that results in a subjective improvement in the deformity. Asymmetry of chest diameter related to concomitant excavatum-type deformity is less likely to respond to bracing attempts. In this way, initial chest CT can be of value in treatment planning.